![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Encyclopedia :
O :
OS :
OS- :
OS-9 |
|
|
OS-9
Later (1983), OS-9/6809 was ported to Motorola 68000 assembly language and extended (called OS-9/68K); and a still later (1989) version was rewritten mostly in C for further portability. (The portable version was initially called OS-9000 and was released for 80386 PC systems around 1989, then ported to PowerPC around 1995.) These later versions lack the memory mapping facilities of OS-9/6809 Level Two, nor did they need them. They used a single flat address space that all processes share; memory mapping hardware, if present, is mostly used to ensure that processes access only that memory they have the right to access. The 680x0 and 80386 (and later) MPUs all directly support far more than 1MB of memory, in any case. OS-9's notion of processes and I/O paths is quite similar to that of Unix in nearly all respects, but there are some significant differences: As a consequence of those design decisions, programs intended for OS-9 use reentrant code exclusively, so that multiple processes can execute a single copy of code in memory, and also use position independent code because the OS-9 kernel loads programs (including shared code) wherever there is sufficient free space available. Programs, device drivers, and I/O managers under OS-9 are all 'modules' and can be loaded and unloaded as needed subject to link counts. OS-9/6809 ran on Motorola EXORbus systems using the Motorola 6809, SS-50 and SS-50C bus systems from companies such as SWTPC, Tano, Gimix, Midwest Scientific, and Smoke Signal Broadcasting, STD-bus 6809 systems from several suppliers, personal computers such as the Fujitsu FM-7 and FM-77, and many others. The best known hardware (due to low price and broad distribution) was the Radio Shack/Tandy Color Computer and its clones such as the British Dragon series. Even on the Color Computer, a quite minimalist hardware platform, it was possible under OS-9/6809 Level One to have more than one interactive user running concurrently (eg, one on the console keyboard and another via a serial connection) as well as several other non-interactive processes. The major limitation (in both access time and maximum capacity) is that no mass storage other than floppy disk was supported by Radio Shack. Hard disks were available from 3rd party sources. On a computer like an SS-50 Gimix, which had more memory, and I/O controllers that did not load the CPU as much as did the CoCo, multiple users were common, even with only 64KB of RAM. With hardware supporting memory management circuits (address translation) and OS-9 Level 2, GUI use was successfully routine, even on the CoCo. This was several years prior to successful GUIs on the 16-bit IBM PC class machines, and many years prior to properly working multi-tasking, multi-user, access-controlled operating systems on the IBM PC type machines or on any of the Apple machines. The various versions of OS-9/68K run on a wide variety of 68000 family platforms, including the Sharp X68000 in Japan, some personal computers intended by their designers as upgrades from the Color Computer (e.g., the 68070 or 68340-based MM/1, and on other computers from Frank Hogg Laboratories, PEP, and Delmar Co). OS-9/68K is also found in some embedded applications, including the Quanta Delta television broadcast character generator, still in production by ScanLine Technologies in Utah. While the user-level interface code on this system started at boot time, there was a hidden, undocumented keyboard sequence that would provide a user (who had sufficient social engineering skills :-) with a root shell prompt, in a scroll window on the device's edit-channel monitor. As you might expect, this could be both useful, and dangerous. OS-9000/80x86 can be run on PC-type machines built around the Intel x86 CPUs. OS-9000 has also been ported to the PowerPC, MIPS, some versions of Advanced RISC Machines' ARM processor, and some of the Hitachi SH family of processors. In addition to the embedded market, where OS-9 has found application in such devices as the Fairlight CMI synthesizers, robotics, and Philips' Compact Disc-Interactive industry standard, OS-9's multi-user and multi-tasking capabilities make it usable for a general-purpose interactive computer system. There have been many third-party interactive applications written for it, such as the Dynacalc spreadsheet, the VED text formatter, and the Stylograph and Screditor-3 WYSIWYG word processors. In 1999, nineteen years after the first release of OS-9, Apple Computer named a version of the operating system for the Macintosh "Mac OS9". Microware sued Apple that year for trademark infringement, but a judge rejected the claim, dismissing the suit in the following year. The judge said that there is little chance for confusion, but one still periodically finds postings to the comp.os.os9 newsgroup from Macintosh users who are at the very least confused about the purpose of that group. Today, OS-9 is a product name used by both the machine language 68K OS and the non-68K (PowerPC, X86, etc.) version written in C, originally known as OS-9000. While very similar, and very compatible at the C level (except for various system call enhancements found only in OS-9000), this change causes some confusion. Before the marketting name change in the late 1990s, OS-9 referred to 68K, while OS-9000 referred to anything else. Today, OS-9 is used to refer to the non-68K versions, while the 68K version is specifically called "OS-9 for 68K". In general, it is a good idea to always specify the processor (or at least "OS-9/non-68K" when meaning the OS formerly known as OS-9000). OS-9 was also used in CD-i. OS-9 is still sold, updated and maintained and being used in products such as in-car navigation. External links
|
|
|
This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. |
|
| © 2008 Chamas Enterprises Inc. |