![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Encyclopedia :
S :
SA :
SAN :
Sandro Botticelli |
|
|
Sandro Botticelli
: a revived Venus Pudica for a new view of pagan Antiquity (Uffizi, Florence) Born in Florence in the working-class rione of Ognissanti, Botticelli was first apprenticed to a goldsmith, then, following the boy's wishes, his doting father sent him to Fra Filippo Lippi who was at work frescoing the Convent of the Carmine. Lippo Lippi's synthesis of the new control of three-dimensional forms, tender expressiveness in face and gesture, and decorative details inherited from the late Gothic style were the strongest influences on Botticelli. A different influence was the new scuptural monumentality of the Pollaiuolo brothers, who were doing a series of Virtues for the Tribunale or meeting hall of the Mercanzia, a cloth-merchants' confraternity, and Botticello contributed to the set the Fortitude, dated 1470 in the Uffizi Gallery . He was an apprentice too of Andrea del Verrocchio, where Leonardo da Vinci worked beside him, but he made his name in his local Church of Ognisanti, with a Saint Augustine that successfully competed as a pendant with Domenico Ghirlandaio's Jerome on the other side "the head of the saint being expressive of profound thought and quick subtlety" (Vasari) In 1470 he opened his own independent studio. Lorenzo de' Medici was quick to employ his talent. Botticelli made consistent use of the circular tondo form and did many beautiful female nudes, according to Vasari. The Birth of Venus (illustration, right) was at the Medici villa of Castello. (2002) He was influenced in his art by Fra Filippo Lippi and Antonio Pollaiuolo. The repeated contacts with the Medici family were undoubtedly useful for granting him political protection and creating conditions ideal for his production of several masterpieces. Sandro was intensely religious. In later life, he was one of Savonarola's followers and burned his own paintings on pagan themes in the notorious "Bonfire of the Vanities". Earlier, Botticelli had painted an Assumption of the Virgin for Matteo Palmieri in a chapel at San Pietro Maggiore in which, it was rumored, both the patron who dictated the iconic scheme and the painter who painted it, were guilty of unidentified heresy, a delicate requirement in such a subject. The heretical notions seem to be gnostic in character:"By the side door of San Piero Maggiore he did a panel for Matteo Palmieri, with a large number of figures representing the Assumption of Our Lady with zones of patriarchs, prophets, apostles, evangelists, martyrs, confessors, doctors, virgins, and the orders of angels, the whole from a design given to him by Matteo, who was a worthy and learned man. He executed this work with the greatest mastery and diligence, introducing the portraits of Matteo and his wife on their knees. But although the great beauty of this work could find no other fault with it, said that Matteo and Sandro were guilty of grave heresy. Whether this be true or not, I cannot say." (Vasari) This is a common misconception based on a mistake by Vasari. The painting referred to here, now in the National Gallery in London, is by the artist Botticini. Vasari confused their similar sounding names. ): icon of the springtime renewal of the Florentine Renaissance, also at the Medici villa at Castello, as a kind of pendant to the Birth of Venus
"Being of a sophistical turn of mind, he there wrote a commentary on a portion of Dante and illustrated the Inferno which he printed, spending much time over it, and this abstension from work led to serious disorders in his living." Thus Vasari characterized the first printed Dante (1481) with Botticelli's decorations; he could not imagine that the new art of printing might occupy an artist. As for the subject, when Fra Girolamo Savonarola began to preach hellfire and damnation, the susceptible Sandro Botticelli became one of his adherents, a piagnone left painting as a worldly vanity, burned much of his own early work, fell into poverty as a result, and would have starved but for the tender support of his former patrons. ReferencesFor an excellent monograph on Botticelli and a catalogue of his works, see Ronald Lightbown Sandro Botticelli, 2 vols. (London: Paul Elek, 1974) For an easily accessible introduction to Botticelli see Ettlinger, L.D. and Helen S., Botticelli (London:Thames and Hudson, 1976) or Levey, M. and Mandel, G., The Complete Paintings of Botticelli (London, 1970 For the Botticelli/Botticini confusion see the National Gallery catalogue: Davies, M., The Earlier Italian Schools (London: National Gallery, 1961) The most important monograph on Botticelli remains Herbert Horne's Alessandro Filipepi, commonly called Sandro Botticelli, painter of Florence (London: G Bell and Sons, 1908), despite the fact that it is nearly one hundred years old! Walter Pater's essay on Botticelli of 1873 (in The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998) remains an excellent piece of art criticism and reveals much of the 19th century attitude to this artist. There remain many confusing opinions on the subject of the Primavera. See the following for a sample of the different ideas. Dempsey includes a lucid introduction to the various schools of thought. Warburg, A., "The Primavera and Birth of Venus by Botticelli" in The Renewal of Pagan Antiquity, 1999, pp.89-156.. Gombrich, E., "Botticelli's Mythologies: A Study in the neo-Platonic Symbolism of his Circle", in Symbolic Images (1972), pp. 31-86. Dempsey, C., The Portrayal of Love. Botticelli's Primavera and Humanist Culture at the Time of Lorenzo the Magnificent (Princeton,1992). Wind, E., Pagan Mysteries of the Renaissance (N.Y., 1968). External LinksSee also
|
|
|
This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. |
|
| © 2008 Chamas Enterprises Inc. |