Temp1

The Arab press generally refer to the suicide bomber as a "human bomb", due to Islam's prohibition on suicide. Since 2002, the Bush administration has used the term homicide bombing, but it has not gained widespread usage.

Overview

Suicide bombings have taken various forms.

Throughout history, soldiers and others have resorted to suicide attacks out of sudden desperation, as to prevent capture or to relieve a pinned-down unit, by simply detonating a grenade while holding it near enemy troops.

In World War II, kamikaze pilots acted as "human missiles" by flying their planes, heavily laden with explosives, directly into enemy warships.

In the Middle East, hundreds of suicide bombings have been undertaken in the last few decades, primarily by Arab men and youths. During the Al-Aqsa Intifada the Palestinians have attempted to kill Israelis using suicide bombers nearly every single day.
They strap themselves with high explosives (and sometimes shrapnel) and seek out a civilian target, often city buses crowded with people at rush hour or, rarely, a military target. If the suicide bombing is successful, the bomber kills a number of people. Recent bombings have targeted civilian women and children and have even been carried out by women, and teenagers with their parents' support and encouragement.

The Tamil Tigers have committed 75 suicide bombings since 1980 [1].

Often there is a religious element involved, besides other motives such as politics or blackmail: many suicide bombers believe that they will attain an otherwordly reward for their sacrifice. Those who send suicide bombers on missions cultivate the belief that suicide bombers are martyrs.

Military historians classify suicide bombing as a form of armed violence, belonging to the tactics of asymmetric warfare -- suicide bombings are only common when one side in a violent conflict lacks the means for effective "conventional" attacks.

Bombings

Suicide bombing usually (but not always) targets poorly-guarded nonmilitary facilities and personnel. It can be either a military tactic, a political one, or a mixture of the two. It may qualify as terrorism where the intention is to kill, maim or terrorise a predominantly civilian target population, or fall within the definition of an act of war where it is committed against a military target under war conditions.

As a political tactic, suicide bombings send a message of impassioned opposition to enemy forces (that the bomber is willing to die for his cause) and a message of desperate recklessness to third parties (that the bomber feels the justice of the cause so strongly that he would rather die than submit and that he is giving little thought to the danger).
However, it may backfire, as suicide bombings ignite rage and hatred and undermine the belief in the humanity of the side performing them.

When used against civilian targets, suicide bombing usually causes fear in the target population greater than that caused by other forms of terrorism, as the fact that the bomber intends to die makes deterrence almost impossible.
Though use against civilian targets have differing effects on their goals (see reaction below). Some economists suggest that this tactic goes beyond symbolism and is actually a response to commodified or controlled or devalued lives, and consider family prestige and financial compensation from the community to compensate for their own life.

The doctrine of asymmetric warfare views suicide bombing in terms of an imbalance of power. Groups with little significant power resort to suicide bombing as a response to actions or policies of a group with great power.
Groups which have significant power have no need to resort to suicide bombing to achieve their aims: in consequence suicide bombing is overwhelmingly used by guerrilla, unlawful enemy combatants, and other irregular fighting forces. Among many such groups, there are religious overtones: bombers and their supporters may believe that their sacrifice will be rewarded in an afterlife. Suicide bombers often believe, correctly or incorrectly, that their actions are in accordance with moral or social standards because they are aimed at fighting unjust acts.

History

Self-sacrifice has always been a concept as part of war. From the earliest days of honoring fallen soldiers as heroes, the concept of self-sacrifice for the cause of one's society or beliefs has been and remains a highly regarded archetype within human societies. Soldiers who lay down their lives to protect their comrades are commonly awarded the highest recognition for courage in battle, while those who survive combat are honored for their sacrifice of time, of innocence, and other injury. Though unlike soldiers that respect the laws of war (which have been observed for centuries in one form or another), suicide bombers do not adhere to primarily targeting military targets alone.

The act of deliberately destroying oneself to inflict harm on an enemy is more restricted to modern times and the era of explosives. The line between the two is considered by some a matter of subjectivity, as in the argument that many WWII soldiers killed were "martyrs" (in the sense that they were to suffer for the sake of a principle, rather than dying as the penalty for refusing to renounce a belief) because their life expectancy in combat was very low -- often averaging only two or three months.

The ritual act of self-sacrifice during combat appeared in a large scale at the end of World War II with the Japanese kamikaze bombers. In these attacks, airplanes were used as flying bombs -- Later in the war, as Japan became more desperate, this act became formalized, ritualized, and planes were outfitted with explosives specific to the task of a suicide mission. Kamikaze strikes were a weapon of symmetric war used by the Empire of Japan chiefly against United States Navy aircraft carriers.
The Japanese also sent two-man midget submariness, essentially manned torpedoes, on suicide missions. After aiming the sub at their target, the two crew members were to embrace and shoot each other in the head. Social support for such choices was strong, due in part to Japanese cultural history, in which seppuku, honorable suicide, was part of samurai duty. It was also fostered and indoctrinated by the Imperial program to persuade, often through coercion (such as through doping), the Japanese soldiers to commit these acts.

Guerrilla groups that have employed suicide bombing include the Kurdistan Workers Party and the Tamil Tigers. Suicide bombing has been a particularly popular tactic amongst some Palestinian guerrilla groups, including Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade. Bombers affiliated with these groups often use so-called "suicide belts", explosive devices designed to be strapped to the body under clothing. The manufacture and shipping of these devices is generally considered a form of support for terrorism.
The term "suicide bombing" became commonplace after the attack on a United States Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, in 1983.

The September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack used large fully-fueled planes as enormous cruise missiles flown into buildings, killing the planes' hijackers, and causing over 2,500 casualties in the process -- making it the most destructive suicide bombing in history. It also had vast economic and political impact: for a cost of 20 attackers' lives and apparently under US$100,000, global markets registered a trillion-dollar drop within a week, and huge new expenditures for military and surveillance technology were made in response.

After the U.S occupied Iraq in 2003, a wave of suicide bombings occurred. The suicide bombers target mainly United States military targets although civilian targets such as Shiite mosques and international offices of the UN and the Red Cross were also attacked.

Suicide bombings have occurred in more than 20 countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, China, Colombia, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Israel, Kenya, Lebanon, Morocco, Pakistan, Panama, the Philippines, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Tunisia, Turkey, and Yemen. (Suicide planes were also used in the United States).

Range of opinions

World leaders usually express resolve to continue on their previous course of affairs after such attacks. Leaders around the globe denounce suicide bombings and sometimes vow not to let such bombings deter what they see as their efforts to further civilization.

Suicide bombings in Israel are usually followed by reprisals. As the suicide bomber himself (the bombers are almost always young men) cannot be targeted, responses often target the community or organization he came from.
In the West Bank the armed forces of Israel usually demolish homes which are claimed to be those of families whose children have volunteered for such missions. Since many families encourage their children to volunteer to such acts, and expecting a financial reward from the Palestinian Authority and other Arab "charity" organizations (Saddam Hussein was known for paying $1010,000-20,000 to families of suicide bombers), the act of demolishing house has a deterring effect.
There are numerous reports in the Israeli press about families who turned in the children after they fear their house will be demolished by the IDF.

It is sometimes claimed that suicide bombings, notably those of the Japanese kamikazes, the Palestinian bombers, and even the September 11, 2001 attacks, were military failures, and highly counter-productive to the perpetrators.
In the case of the kamikazes, this is seen as untrue by some: although the kamikaze attacks could not stop the Allied advance, they inflicted more casualties and delayed the fall of Japan for longer than might have been the case using only the conventional methods available to the Empire.
The kamikaze attacks did reinforce the resolution of the World War II Allies to destroy the Imperial force, though. In the case of the September 11th attacks, the long-term effects remain to be seen, but in the short to medium term, the results were profound: since September 11th Western nations have diverted massive resources into unexpected areas and no citizen remains untouched.

The Palestinian suicide bombings, however, are more challenging to assess to some. In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, there was a steady and continuous deployment of suicide bombers in 2000 following the collapse of the Camp David II summit between the PLO and Israel.
In response, Israel mobilized its army in order to seal off the Gaza Strip and re-occupy the West Bank, placing it under military rule with the area patrolled by tanks, and the Israelis began a campaign of targeted assassinations to terminate militant Palestinian leaders (using jets and helicopters for this purpose).

Most significantly, the suicide missions having killed hundreds and maimed thousands of Israelis is believed by some to have brought on a move to the political right and the rise of a hard-line government and policy headed by the militaristic general, prime minister Ariel Sharon.
Sharon's government has imposed restrictions on the Palestinian community, making commerce, travel, schooling, and everyday life difficult for the Palestinians, with the average Palestinian suffering due to the choices of the suicide bombers.

Social support by some for this activity remains, however, as of the calling of a truce at the end of June 2003. This may be due to the economic or social purpose of the suicide bombing and the refusal to accept external judgements on those who sanction them.
The peace plan presently being discussed may be better from the Palestinians' point of view than that which existed prior to the 2000 renewal of conflict. Such attacks, though, have stalled and stopped peace plans in the past (which continues the Palestinian occupation) and sparked deep mutual hatred and distrust, so these attacks may be counterproductive.
Suicide bombing may thus "work" as a military tactic (in that it may cost fewer lives than any conventional war) and may or may not achieve the political objectives sought by the combatant. It is likely to remain a feature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Related terms

"Homicide bombing" is a neologism, that was coined to de-emphasize the self-sacrificial connotations of suicide bombing and emphasize a criminal connotation (murder). Homicide bombing can include any individual that uses explosives to kill others, regardless of if the individual is killed in the act or not. In April 2002, White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer coined homicide bombing. Word Spy defines it as follows:

"A bombing that intentionally kills another person; a suicide bombing in which the bomber's intent is to kill other people". [1]

Proponents of this phrase believe that homicide is a more appropriate label than suicide, because suicide by definition refers to killing oneself, whereas the act referred to by suicide bombing is actually intended to kill many other people. Bombings can be more accurately described in term of a homicide bomber's actions when referring to all those who kill other people with bombs (or explosives).

Some critics of homicide bombing state that this is an inaccurate phrase of certain types of bombings (and it should not be used to describe suicide bombings), on the grounds that the term "homicide bomber" would refer to those who kill other people with bombs but not themselves, such as someone who leaves a booby-trap or tosses a grenade (though, this is explicitly included in the general definition of homicide bombing). These critics contend that the phrase is repeating the same thing in different words because the bombing part of the phrase implies the homicidal nature of the action. Critics state that the adjective suicide is needed to distinguish from bombing in which the bomber does not intend to be killed, because those willing to commit suicide are less susceptible to deterrence. Other critics see this act as a legitimate one worthy of the honor of their cause, belief or community.

Some decline to associate either suicide or homicide in their reference to any of unlawful attacks. These objectors generally consider certain bombers to be martyrs; they object to calling the people killed by the bombs "homicide victims". Objections to the use of this phrase comes from people who disagree as to whether the events of bombings constitute "murder" (inparticular in the Middle East; though other occurances are included).

The Arab term related to suicide bombing is "Isshtahad" or "Shuada", wereas the suicide bomber is called a Shaid. The original meaning of the word "Shaid" in Arabic is a person who died in a Jihad in order to testify his faith in Allah. The term "Shaid" is used extensively by the Palestinian Authority in part to overcome the stigma and Islamic strictures against suicide. This term has been embraced by Hamas, Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades and other Palestinian factions engaging suicide bombings. Other argue that Palestinians are using the term "Shaid" for any the Palestinians killed during the 3 years of hostalities. As suicide bombing has become frequent in Arab-Israel conflict in the late 20 century, different phrases are employed by both camps to bring positive or negative connotation.

See also

• terrorism
• freedom fries
• asymmetric warfare
• assassination
• female suicide bomber
• martyrdom operation

  External links, resources, references

• Suicide Bombers - Why do they do it, and what does Islam say about their actions?
• What makes suicide bombers tick? - Suicide bomber profile and info
• Why We Have Become Suicide Bombers : Understanding Palestinian Terror
• The Culture of Martyrdom - How suicide bombing became not just a means but an end
• Erased In A Moment : Suicide Bombing Attacks Against Israeli Civilians [Human Rights Watch]
• History of use of the phrase "suicide bomber"
• History of use of the phrase "homicide bombing"
• USAF Suicide Bombers Intelligence Brief